Environmental Friendly Bio-pesticides: A Review (2024)

Thomson M1* and Vijan A2

1PES College of Pharmacy, Bangalore, India

2Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India

*Corresponding Author:
Thomson M
PES College of Pharmacy, Bangalore. India.
E-mail: mudumala.thomson @gmail.com

Received Date: 10/11/2016; Revised Date: 11/11/2016; Accepted Date: 15/11/2016

Visit for more related articles at

Environmental Friendly Bio-pesticides: A Review (1)

Abstract

Synthetic pesticides and chemical fertilizers which are being used for the agriculture are resulting in residues of chemicals in soil, water, air there by causing a hazardous contamination. By promoting different methods of eco-friendly agriculture like Organic farming, Bio-pesticides global goal of sustainable agriculture can be achieved improving the quality and quantity of food produced globally. This goal of sustainable agriculture can only be achieved by creating awareness among farmers, community and society.

Keywords

Bio-pesticides, Organic farming, Synthetic pesticides, Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs).

Introduction

The United Nations predicts that there will be demand for increase in world food production by 70% in order to cope up with the ever increasing demand of food as a result of increase in global population [1]. Food production is the agenda of all the countries, as the global population is predicted to be close to ≈10 billion by 2050. Usage of chemical pesticides has severely affected both the abiotic and biotic components of the environment. Forming degradants and harmful components in the process contaminating soil, air, water, food etc. Also there are reported problems of Phytotoxicity, physiological deformities, diseases, mortality, population changes, genetic disorders, gene erosion, etc. in plant, mammal, avian, insect and other organisms. Chemical pesticides are one of cause for destruction of food chain and their bioaccumulation triggers severe consequences. But when compared to the conventional agriculture most of the weeds, pests, insects and diseases were prevented by usage of natural and sustainable practices such as cultural, mechanical, and physical control strategies.

Sustainable agricultural practices and environmental friendly methods are crucial for survival on the Earth. Bio pesticides may be taken into consideration as one of the components required to protect the environment for sustainable agricultural production [2].

Alternatives for Pesticides:

The efficient standard Package of Practice (SPP) for plants in nursery includes by preparing a primary bed of fertile mixture of jungle soil, Farm Yard Manure (FYM) and sand in the ratio of 6:2:1 [3]. One of the macronutrients essential for plants is Phosphorus. It rapidly gets immobilized when added as a soluble fertilizer [4]. Rock phosphate (RP) is solubilized effectively by fungi than bacteria [5]. Agriculture is also affected by usage of bactericides, fungicides, weeds and insecticides, leading to reduced yield and detoriating the soil with contaminants [6]. Insecticidal properties of DDT were pavement for developing organochlorine and organophosphate insecticides for control of insects damaging yield of crops [7].

In organic farming faeces of animal are replaced as a fertilizer instead of synthetic pesticides [8]. The usage of biopesticides as part of sustainable agriculture process involves creating awareness among farmers and encouraging agro-drugs with reasonable cost is crucial to ensure the economic sustainability and further development [9]. Ill effects of the agrochemicals include resistance to pesticide, resurgence of pest, chemical residues in the soil, air and water there by contaminating environment [10].

Factors such as concentration of substrate, temperature, soil pH etc. also affect the yield of agriculture [11]. Practicing of organic agriculture requires balancing nutritional supplement and eco-friendly pest consequently achieving the quality and quantity of the agricultural outputs [12]. The strategy chalked out by ICM to counteract degrading ecosystem in agriculture as a result of practices of intensive agriculture, this also includes implementing water conservation practices, conservation of biodiversity etc. there by protecting the agro ecosystem [13].

From bio control strains of the genus Trichoderma certain metabolites produced by beneficial fungi have been identified and isolated [14]. Biocontrol agent is capable of reducing the production of toxic metabolites thereby reducing soil contamination [15]. Usage of biopesticides replacing synthetic pesticides may result in slow performance as compared to synthetic pesticides [16]. In 2013 approximately 400 registered products of biopesticide active component and more than 1250 registered biopesticide products were available in the market [17].

Effects:

There are reported cases to establish that exposure to pesticides leads to chronic diseases like different types of cancers, neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson, Senile dementia, and Lou Gehrig’s disease which are characterized by progressive nervous system dysfunction. There are also reported cases of Diabetes, Liver cirrhosis, Sexual disorders and birth defects in new born [18-23]. To assess the potency of toxins in pesticides Allium cepa is generally used [24-28].

Techniques:

By using synthetic pesticides for cultivation, pesticides protrude into soil and plants thereby drastically affecting them. The agricultural soil is affected by harming useful micro-organisms, beneficial insects, worms. Pant biochemistry and physiology are affecting resulting to reduced immunity of plant [29-39].Microorganisms are deployed as microbial pesticides which can be helpful in preventing the plant fall prey to pests. The subspecies and strains of Bacillus thuringiensis commonly utilized as microbial pesticides which is also eco-friendly [40-44].

Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) are plants contain certain strains of genes which are inserted resulting in plants producing a pesticide in its own tissues. For instance, researchers can take the gene containing strain for a particular for Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal protein, and make the plant develop pest of its own in the process. Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) typically controls pest by non-toxic mechanism which does not harm the environment [45-54].

DNA shuffling, synonymous with the name molecular breeding, is a technology where generation of large libraries of novel genes which are resistant can be selected based on functional properties [55-59].

Benefits [60-66]:

• Bio pesticides decompose quickly without contaminating soil and are effective in small quantities.

• They can be deployed to target a certain pests and closely related organisms.

• Conventional pesticides can be replaced with Bio pesticides simultaneously increasing the agricultural production.

Remedy for damage caused by Pesticides:

The actual resolution for damage due to pesticides lays organic farming and non-toxics methods of cultivation in agriculture, sustainable techniques for pest control [67], pest management [68-71] and organic farming [72,73] food production are step to prevent pesticides to reduce the harm to the environment, atmosphere [74-99] and human health.

Conclusion

By the complete examination, we can conclude to preventable cautions for proper usage of pesticides which are environmentally friendly. The proper regulatory system is to be implemented by the government for usage of pesticides. We have to cultivate practices of non-toxic pest management [100-102] programs by creating awareness by educating in public places like parks, schools, roads etc.

References

  1. Kumar S. Biopesticide: An Environment Friendly Pest Management Strategy. J Biofertil Biopestici 2015;6:e127.
  2. Mazid S, et al. A review on the use of biopesticides in insect pest management. International J Sci Advanced Technol. 2011;1:169-178.
  3. Prasad, et al. Evaluation of Bio-inoculants Enriched Marginal Soils as Potting Mixture in Coffee Nursery. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:148.
  4. Sane SA and Mehta SK. Isolation and Evaluation of Rock Phosphate Solubilizing Fungi as Potential Bio-fertilizer. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:156.
  5. Nahas E. Factors determining rock phosphate solubilization by microorganisms isolated from soil. World J MicrobiolBiotechnol. 1996;12:567-572.
  6. Kumar S and Singh A. Biopesticides: Present Status and the Future Prospects. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:e129.
  7. Bekele D, et al. Bioactive Chemical Constituents from the Leaf of Oreosyce africana Hook.f (Cucurbitaceae) with Mosquitocidal Activities against Adult Anopheles arabiensis, the Principal Malaria Vector in Ethiopia. J Fertil Pestic. 2016;7:159.
  8. Hamouda R, et al. Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Bio-fertilizers. J Fertil Pestic. 2016;7:161.
  9. Zecca F. Agro Drugs Market and Sustainability - Biopesticides. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2014;5:e123.
  10. Al-Zaidi AA, et al. Negative effects of pesticides on the environment and the farmers awareness in Saudi Arabia: a case study. J Anim Plant Sci. 2011;21:605-611.
  11. Hamouda R, et al. Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Bio-fertilizers. J Fertil Pestic. 2016;7:161.
  12. Raja N and Masresha G. Plant Based Biopesticides: Safer Alternative for Organic Food Production. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:e128.
  13. Kumar S. The role of biopesticides in sustainably feeding the nine billion global populations. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2013;4:e114.
  14. Vinale F. Biopesticides and Biofertilizers Based on Fungal Secondary Metabolites. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2014; 5:e119.
  15. Vinale F, et al. Factors affecting the production of Trichodermaharzianum secondary metabolites during the interaction with different plant pathogens. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48:705-711.
  16. Kumar S and Singh A. Biopesticides for Integrated Crop Management: Environmental and Regulatory Aspects. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2014;5:e121.
  17. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2013) Regulating biopesticides.
  18. Burger J, et al. The ‘necessary extent’ of pesticide use—Thoughts about a key term in German pesticide policy.Crop Prot.2008;27:343-351.
  19. Bokhart M, et al. Determination of Organochlorine Pesticides in Wildlife Liver and Serum Using Gas Chromatography Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry.J Chromatogr Sep Tech. 2015;6:286.
  20. Berny P. Pesticides and the intoxication of wild animals.J. Vet. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;30:93-100.
  21. Boxall RA. Post-harvest losses to insects-a world overview.Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2001;48:137-152.
  22. Atreya K. Pesticide use knowledge and practices: A gender differences in Nepal.Environ Res. 2007;104:305-311.
  23. Abdel-Gawad H, et al. 14C-Prothiofos Residues in the Presence of Deltamethrin and Dimilin Pesticides in Cotton Seeds and Oils, Removal of Prothiofos Residues in Oils and Bioavailability of its Bound Residues to Rats.J Environ Anal Chem. 2015,2:145.
  24. Liman R, et al. Testing of the mutagenicity and genotoxicity of metolcarb by using both Ames/Salmonella and Allium Test. Chemosphere. 2010;80:1056-1061.
  25. Saxena PN, et al. Carbofuran induced cytogenetic effects in root meristemcells of Allium cepa and Allium sativum: a spectroscopic approach for chromosome damage. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2010;96:93-100.
  26. Sharma S and Vig AP. Genotoxicity of Atrazine, Avenoxan, Diuron and Quizalofop-P-ethyl herbicides using the Allium cepa root chromosomal aberration assay, Terr Aquat Environ Toxicol. 2012;6:90-95.
  27. Turkoglu S. Determination of genotoxic effects of chlorfenvinphos and fenbuconazole in Allium cepa root cells by mitotic activity chromosome aberration DNA content and comet assay, Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2012;103:224–230.
  28. Ozakca DU and Silah H. Genotoxicity effects of Flusilazole on the somatic cells of Allium cepa, Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2013;107:38-43.
  29. Ramales V, et al. Biosorption of B-aflatoxins Using Biomasses Obtained from Formosa Firethorn [Pyracantha koidzumii Hayata Rehder]. Toxins. 2016;8:218.
  30. Matthews GA. Determination of droplet size. Pest Art News Sum. 1975;21:213-225.
  31. Malaquin S, et al. Respiratory Effects of Sarafotoxins from the Venom of Different Atractaspis Genus Snake Species. Toxins. 2016;8:215.
  32. Muthuramalingam M, et al. Toxin-Antitoxin Modules Are Pliable Switches Activated by Multiple Protease Pathways. Toxins. 2016;8:214.
  33. Shi D, et al. A New Myotropic Tryptophyllin-3 Peptide Isolated from the Skin Secretion of the Purple-Sided Leaf Frog, Phyllomedusa baltea. Toxins. 2016;8:213.
  34. Burgos M, et al. Cells Deficient in the Fanconi Anemia Protein FANCD2 are Hypersensitive to the Cytotoxicity and DNA Damage Induced by Coffee and Caffeic Acid. Toxins. 2016;8:211.
  35. Feyereisen R. Insect Molecular Biology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, San Francisco. 2012;8:236-316.
  36. Hershey AE. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, San Francisco, USA. 2010;17:659-694.
  37. Estenik JF and Collins WJ. Pesticide and Xenobiotic Metabolism in Aquatic Organisms. ACS Symp Ser 99, American Chemical Society, Washington DC. 1979,21:349-370.
  38. Debono J, et al. Canopy Venom: Proteomic Comparison among New World Arboreal Pit-Viper Venoms. Toxins. 2016;8:210.
  39. Zhao Z, et al. Distribution and Metabolism of Bt-Cry1Ac Toxin in Tissues and Organs of the Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Toxins. 2016;8:212.
  40. Densilin DM, et al. Effect of Individual and Combined Application of Biofertilizers, Inorganic Fertilizer and Vermicompost on the Biochemical Constituents of Chilli (Ns - 1701). J Biofertil Biopestici. 2011;2:106.
  41. Pandiarajan G, et al. Exploration of Different Azospirillum Strains from Various Crop Soils of SrivilliputturTaluk. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:117.
  42. Al-shannaf HM, et al. Toxic and Biochemical Effects of Some Bioinsecticides and Igrs on American Bollworm, Helicoverpaarmigera in Cotton Fields. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:118.
  43. Torres JB. Insecticide Resistance in Natural Enemies - Seeking for Integration of Chemical and Biological Controls. J Biofert Biopest. 2012;3:e104.
  44. Praveen Kumar G, et al.Plant Growth Promoting Pseudomonas spp. from Diverse Agro-Ecosystems of India for Sorghum bicolor L. J Biofert Biopest. 2012;S7:001.
  45. Kumar S Biopesticides: A Need for Food and Environmental Safety. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:e107.
  46. Balachandar D. Biofertilizers “What Next?” J Biofertil Bio pestici. 2012;3:e108 .
  47. Khan AM, et al. Wheat Crop Yield Losses Caused by the Aphids Infestation. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:122.
  48. Pindi PK and Satyanarayana. Liquid Microbial Consortium- A Potential Tool for Sustainable Soil Health. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:124.
  49. Poopathi S. Current Trends in the Control of Mosquito Vectors by Means of Biological Larvicides. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:125.
  50. Khan AA, et al. Assessment of CalotropisProceraAiton and Datura alba Nees Leaves Extracts as Bio-Insecticides Against TriboliumcastaneumHerbst in Stored Wheat TriticumAestivum L. J Biofertil Biopestici .2012;3:126.
  51. Raja N. .Biopesticides and Biofertilizers: Ecofriendly Sources for Sustainable Agriculture. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2013;4:e112.
  52. Paul N, et al. Evaluation of Biofertilizers in Cultured Rice. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2013;4:133.
  53. Karunamoorthi K. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: A Major Source of Green Pesticides/Risk -Reduced Pesticides. Med Aromat Plants. 2012;1:e137.
  54. Sarkar M and Kshirsagar R. Botanical Pesticides: Current Challenges and Reverse Pharmacological Approach for Future Discoveries. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2014; 5:1000:e125.
  55. Goda SK. Pesticides and Cancer: The Use of Pesticides in the Developing Country. J Bioremed Biodeg. 2014;5:e155.
  56. VandeCasteele JP. Petroleum Microbiology: Concepts, Environmental Implications, Industrial Applications. Volume 2, 2008; Editions Technip, 27 Rue Ginoux, 75737 Paris, France.
  57. Bedouelle H and Vandecasteele JP. Application of molecular biology and protein engineering to the degradation of hydrocarbons. 2008.
  58. Suenaga H, et al. Hybrid pseudomonads engineered by two-step hom*ologous recombination acquire novel degradation abilities toward aromatics and polychlorinated biphenyls. ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol. 2010;88:915-923.
  59. Singh A, et al. Use of Vegetable Oils as Biopesticide in Grain Protection -A Review. J BiofertilBiopestici. 2012;3:114.
  60. Jhala YK, et al. Biodiversity of Endorhizospheric Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:151.
  61. Bindhu VR, et al. Mortality Effects of Some Medicinal Plants on the Pulse Beetle Callosobruchuschinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:150.
  62. Navaneetha T, et al. Liquid Formulation of Trichoderma Species for Management of Gray Mold in Castor (Ricinuscommunis L.) and Alternaria Leaf Blight in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:149.
  63. Prasad, et al. Evaluation of Bio-inoculants Enriched Marginal Soils as Potting Mixture in Coffee Nursery. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:148.
  64. Sreerag and Jayaprakash. Management of Two Major Sucking Pests Using Neem Oil Formulation. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:147.
  65. Elbanna K, et al. Characterization of Egyptian Fluorescent Rhizosphere Pseudomonad Isolates with High Nematicidal Activity against the Plant Parasitic Nematode Meloidogyne Incognita. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2010;1:102.
  66. Sarkar M and Kshirsagar R. Botanical Pesticides: Current Challenges and Reverse Pharmacological Approach for Future Discoveries. J Biofertil Biopesti. 2014;5:125.
  67. Bendetti D, et al. An Evaluation of Occupational Exposures to Pesticides in Brazil. Occup Med Health Aff. 2014;2:170.
  68. Batool Z and Haque A. Structure Prediction of Delta Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase ALAD; An Enzyme that is Very Sensitive to the Toxic Effects of Lead. J Biom Biostat. 2015;6:259.
  69. Chgoury F, et al. Effectiveness of the Androctonus Australis Hector Nanobody Nbf12-10 Antivenom to Neutralize Significantly the Toxic Effect and Tissue Damage Provoked by Fraction of Androctonus mauretanicus Morocco Scorpion Venom. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;4:174.
  70. Tripathi BD and Tripathi DM, Toxic Effects of Distillery Sludge Amendment on Microbiological and Enzymatic Properties of Agricultural Soil in a Tropical City. J Environment Analytic Toxicol. 2011;1:102.
  71. Tripathi BD. A Short Term Study on Toxic Effects of Distillery Sludge Amendment on Microbiological and Enzymatic Properties of Agricultural Soil in a Tropical City. J Earth Sci Climat Change. 2011;1:106.
  72. Karunamoorthi K, Plant-Based Insect Repellents: Is That a Sustainable Option to Curb the Malaria Burden in Africa? Medicinal Aromatic Plants. 2012;1:106.
  73. Ozolua RI, et al. Extract of Garcinia kola Seed has Antitussive Effect and Attenuates Hypercholesterolemia in Rodents. Med Aromat Plants. 2016;5:232.
  74. Pogun S, et al. Oral Nicotine Self- Administration in Rodents. J Addict Res Ther. 2012;S2:004.
  75. Wang Z and Zhang H. Antidiabetic Effects of Ginseng in Humans and Rodents. J Metabolic Synd. 2012;1:106.
  76. Taaheri SM, et al. Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid in Preventing Experimental Choroidal Neovascularization in Rodents. J Clinic Experiment Ophthalmol. 2011;2:187.
  77. Jeon TW, et al. A Study on Leaching Property of Hazardous Substances in Coal Ash Through the Column Test Percolation test. J Environ Anal Toxicol. 2016;6:354.
  78. MMA EG and Bondkly AMAE. Optimization of Solid State Fermentation and Leaching Process Parameters for Improvement Xylanase Production by Endophytic Streptomyces sp. ESRAA-301097. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2014;6:154-166.
  79. Muslim A. Adsorption of Copper Complexes on Anion Exchange Resin in Non-Ammoniacal and Ammoniacal Thiosulfate Leaching Systems. J Chem Eng Process Technol. 2012;3:121.
  80. Melamed I. Alzheimer’s disease of the Immune System: A New Variant of Immune Deficiency. Immunother Open Acc. 2016;2:115.
  81. Allen HB, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: A Novel Hypothesis Integrating Spirochetes, Biofilm, and the Immune System. J Neuroinfect Dis. 2016;7:200.
  82. Boukelia B. Exercise, Immune System and Circadian Rhythm. J Sports Med Doping Stud. 2015;5:163
  83. León TEJ and Torres ER. IV García, Immune System and Pituitary Tumors: TILs Death tears them apart. A Review. J Cytol Histol. 2015;6:332.
  84. Turhan A. Immune System Behavior during Herpesvirus Infection in Childhood. J Infect Dis Ther. 2014;2:104.
  85. Stamenkovic H, et al. Immune System Behavior during Herpesvirus Infection in Childhood. J Infect Dis Ther. 2014;2:162.
  86. Kallick RCA. The Potential Relationship of the Ehrlichia to Immune System Dysfunction: Etiology and Pathogenesis. Rheumatology. 2014;4:128.
  87. Karacabey K and Ozdemir N. The Effect of Nutritional Elements on the Immune System. J Obes Wt Loss Ther. 2012;2:152.
  88. Theron AJ, et al. Harmful Interactions of Non- Essential Heavy Metals with Cells of the Innate Immune System. J Clinic Toxicol. 2012;S3:005.
  89. Perez GLA, et al. Role of Cell Wall Polysaccharides during Recognition of Candida albicans by the Innate Immune System. J Glycobio. 2011;1:102.
  90. Logani MK, et al. Millimeter Wave and Drug Induced Modulation of the Immune System -Application in Cancer Immunotherapy. J Cell Sci Ther. 2011;S5:002.
  91. White JF, et al. Nutritional Endosymbiotic Systems in Plants: Bacteria Function like ‘Quasi-Organelles’ to Convert Atmospheric Nitrogen into Plant Nutrients. J Plant Pathol Microb. 2012;3:104.
  92. Chen Y, et al. Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Fertilization on Western Flower Thrips Population Level and Quality of Susceptible and Resistant Impatiens. Adv Crop Sci Tech. 2014;2:145.
  93. Eubanks DL. Plasma Calcium, Phosphorous and Magnesium Levels in Cats with and without Tooth Resorption. J Veterinar Sci Technol. 2011;S3:001.
  94. Guettala S, et al. Properties of the Compressed-Stabilized Earth Brick Containing Cork Granules. J Earth Sci Clim Change. 2016;7:353.
  95. Liang L, et al. Comparative Study on Fluorescence Spectra of Chinese Medicine North and South Isatis Root Granules. Nat Prod Chem Res. 2016;4:201.
  96. Drakides C and Lay SM. Aerobic Granules Formation in Dual- Layer Percolating Filters. J Civil Environment Engg 2012;2:112.
  97. Singh J, et al. Pharmacological Efficacy of Insulin- Loaded Granules Made Up of Various Grades of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose in Normal Rats. J Bioequiv Availab. 2015;07:257-261.
  98. Sayed AEDH, Evaluation of Apoptotic Cell Death and Genotoxicty Following Exposure to Silver Nanoparticles in African Catfish Clarias gariepinus. Toxicol open access. 2016;2:109.
  99. Chen Y, et al. Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Fertilization on Western Flower Thrips Population Level and Quality of Susceptible and Resistant Impatiens. Adv Crop Sci Tech. 2014;2:145.
  100. Bendetti D, et al. An Evaluation of Occupational Exposures to Pesticides in Brazil. Occup Med Health Aff. 2014;2:170.
  101. Batool Z and Haque A. Structure Prediction of Delta Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase ALAD; An Enzyme that is Very Sensitive to the Toxic Effects of Lead. J Biom Biostat. 2015;6:259.
  102. Chgoury F, et al. Effectiveness of the Androctonus Australis Hector Nanobody Nbf12-10 Antivenom to Neutralize Significantly the Toxic Effect and Tissue Damage Provoked by Fraction of Androctonus mauretanicus Morocco Scorpion Venom. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;4:174.
Environmental Friendly Bio-pesticides: A Review (2024)

FAQs

How effective are biopesticides? ›

Biopesticides often are effective in very small quantities and often decompose quickly, resulting in lower exposures and largely avoiding the pollution problems caused by conventional pesticides.

What are 5 examples of biopesticides? ›

Neem, Tobacco, Garlic, Onion, Citronella, Jatropha etc. are potent sources of biopesticides which are already under commercialization. Different species of Trichoderma, Bacillus sp. etc. have also been isolated with potent anti-microbial activity.

Do you think bio pesticides a better choice than other pesticides if so why? ›

-Biopesticides are preferred over chemical pesticides because they do not contaminate the environment. The chemicals in chemical pesticides are extremely toxic and harmful to the environment.

What are the cons of biopesticides? ›

Downsides include: A slower rate of control and often a lower efficacy and shorter persistence compared to conventional pesticides.

Are biopesticides better for the environment? ›

The synthetic nature of pesticides also harms animals, beneficial insects, microorganisms, and plants, as well as humans. Fortunately, however, there are many natural pesticides, the so-called biopesticides, that are also effective against pests and more importantly, do not interfere with the well-being of ecosystems.

Are biopesticides harmful to the environment? ›

Biopesticides are natural compounds considered more safe and sustainable for the environment.

Which plant is used as a biopesticide? ›

Some of the plants for which we have carried out such tests are neem, garlic, onion, persian lilac, turmeric, ginger, tobacco, papaya, leucas, pongam, tulasi, aloe, custard apple, vitex, sweetflag, poison nut, calotropis etc.

What is the most popular biopesticide? ›

The most common microbial biopesticide is Bacillus thuringiensis. Substances Found in Nature – These include plant materials like corn gluten, garlic oil, and black pepper. These also include insect hormones that regulate mating, molting, and food-finding behaviors. They tend to control pests without killing them.

Is garlic a biopesticide? ›

Used as a pesticide, garlic has a non-toxic mode of action for repelling target birds and insects. Garlic is presumed to be non-persistent since it is material known to rapidly degrade in the environment. EPA has received no reports of adverse effects resulting from its use.

Is Neem a biopesticide? ›

Neem has been used to make what is known as a biopesticide, which is environmentally beneficial and has no adverse effects on plants or soil [26]. The major element in neem used to produce these biopesticides is azadirachtin [27].

Are biopesticides expensive? ›

On the negative side, biopesticides usually are more expensive than synthetic pesticides. It must be pointed out, however, that fewer applications normally are required.

What are 3 reasons we should not use pesticides? ›

Pesticides are hazardous to our health. pesticide exposure range from mild symptoms of dizziness and nausea to serious, long-term neurological, developmental and reproductive disorders.”

Are biopesticides more expensive than pesticides? ›

But biopesticides can be quite expensive compared to synthetic pesticides. They often don't work as quickly and they have to be applied more frequently, making them a tough sell in some markets. Paul Underhill, co-owner of Terra Firma Farm, an organic grower in Winters, Calif., has tried a few.

Are biopesticides cheaper than pesticides? ›

Equally, synthetic pesticides harm the soil texture, soil microbes, animals, and plants. The dangers associated with the use of synthetic pesticides have necessitated the need for alternative use of organic pesticides (biopesticides), which are cheaper, environment friendly, and sustainable.

What are 5 cons of pesticides? ›

On the other hand, the disadvantages to widespread pesticide use are significant. They include domestic animal contaminations and deaths, loss of natural antagonists to pests, pesticide resistance, Honeybee and pollination decline, losses to adjacent crops, fishery and bird losses, and contamination of groundwater.

What are the most effective biopesticides? ›

In the potato industry, the best known biopesticide is referred to as Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis. This is an example of a microbial biopesticide. B. thuringiensis is a soil bacterium, toxic to many insect larvae.

Why are pesticides less effective? ›

Over time many pesticides have gradually lost their effectiveness because pests have developed resistance – a significant decrease in sensitivity to a pesticide, which reduces the field performance of these pesticides.

What is the growth rate of the biopesticides market? ›

Market Size and Growth Rate: The biopesticides market has witnessed significant growth recently. It is projected to reach USD 13.9 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 15.9% from 2023 to 2028​​​​.

What makes a pesticide effective? ›

In addition to the active ingredient in the pesticide, auxiliary components can be added to the pesticide formulation or separately to the spray tank. These auxiliary elements are also called adjuvants, and they are used to ensure the effect of pesticides in different environmental conditions.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tyson Zemlak

Last Updated:

Views: 6022

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tyson Zemlak

Birthday: 1992-03-17

Address: Apt. 662 96191 Quigley Dam, Kubview, MA 42013

Phone: +441678032891

Job: Community-Services Orchestrator

Hobby: Coffee roasting, Calligraphy, Metalworking, Fashion, Vehicle restoration, Shopping, Photography

Introduction: My name is Tyson Zemlak, I am a excited, light, sparkling, super, open, fair, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.